I definitely enjoyed
reading the theories of Reader-Response Criticism more than I enjoyed New Criticism.
I really liked reading the Psychological Reader-Response theory because I also
relate what I have read back to myself.
Our psychology affects
our interpretations of text because our personal experiences give the text
meaning. We project ourselves into the texts we read and we identify ourselves
through them. Norman Holland said that reader interpretations revel more about
themselves than about the text, I believe this, because I am a victim of sexual
assault, so reading text about sexual assault for me brings up emotional
moments and memories compared to someone who is reading the same text and has
never been sexually assaulted.
An interpretive community
is a community of people who share the same interpretive strategies of analyzing
a text. Stanley Fish believed that everyone’s “individual subjective” responses
to literature were just products of an interpretive community. They condition
our reading because we learn to interpret a text based on the way someone else interprets
theirs. An example of this can be seen in school.
Discovering an author’s
identify theme means to discover their thoughts, feelings, fears, etc based on
their personal experiences that they project into their own writings.
Good comments--so what's the difference between our individual interpretations and the interpretations we learn to make (and conditioned to make) because our our belonging to interpretive communities?
ReplyDelete