Reflection
I
did a Marxist reading of A
Rose for Emily
by William Faulkner about how Emily was of high economic and social
class but this highness in society was not enough to make her happy.
I honestly only choose to do a Marxist reading of A
Rose for Emily
because it seemed the easiest to write. It was between
A Rose for Emily or
Perfume:
The Story of a Murderer
by Patrick Suskind and honestly I love the novel, but I felt like I
did not have enough time to reread a novel and write an essay based
on a literary theory. Plus A
Rose for Emily seemed
more clear cut and much more manageable to work with. The short story
had a lot to do with Emily’s socio-economic background and that is
a crucial element for any Marxist reading.
In all honesty if I
had performed a Reader-Response analysis on A
Rose for Emily I
would not have included quotations that obviously point out Emily’s
high status in society because it would not have applied to
Reader-Response. If I had done a Reader-Response analysis on A
Rose for Emily
I would have focused on how the reader felt about Emily’s inter
turmoil about liking Homer Baron but also being raised in a way where
she would have to abide by her father’s ways of life. Her father
believed anyone of lower class could not marry his daughter. I would
elaborate on how as a reader that I would feel with those conflicting
emotions and how I view Emily. For my quotations I would focus on
parts of the short story where Emily’s thoughts were guessed from
the fellow town’s people and based upon her actions.
If
I had done a New Historical/Cultural theory I would have focused on
the time period that A
Rose for Emily takes
place and talk about how that impacts the story. A
Rose for Emily takes
place at during the turn of the 19th
century into the 20th
century and a large portion of Emily’s life. She was born into a
time when family names and statuses were respected and during her
life she saw the downfall of this prestige and nobility. I would talk
about the normalcies of the time period and use them to explain
Emily’s actions. I would use quotations of historical dates and
behaviors and I would also use examples within the text of common
practices of culture within the story.
I
did not like the other two school of theories for A
Rose for Emily so
I choose a Marxist reading. Plus it was the first idea that had come
into my head and I just went for it because I just usually go off my
first thoughts. I did not not usually writing a Marxist theory for A
Rose for Emily but
I think it was just because of the complexity of the actual paper’s
requirements. I am not sure I would have enjoyed writing this paper
no matter what school of theory it was. If I could not have written a
Marxist reading of A
Rose for Emily, I
would have definitely written a New Historical/Cultural reading of A
Rose for Emily because
of all three theories, it sounds like it would be the most fun and
interesting to research. If I had given more time to logically think
all three options through, I would have probably done this approach
but since it came to me while I had already started my topic within
Marxism I did not change it. I would have dreaded writing a
Reader-Response reading because I hate Reader-Response theories. The
hardest part about writing this paper was the lack of specific
secondary sources.
No comments:
Post a Comment