Thursday, May 7, 2015

More...

Ok, so here's what I have right now.  My brain is oatmeal right now, so I'm not sure that I'll write any more today.  If I do, I'll post it again, and email it to you.




A Cultural Criticism of Fifty Shades of Grey

            When Fifty Shades of Grey was released, it took the world by storm.  It is one of the fastest and bestselling books of all time.  Author E.L. James began the book as a work of Twilight fanfiction, another hugely popular series of books.  What Twilight did not have, however, was a BDSM element.  BDSM is a blanket term for bondage/discipline, domination/submission, and sadism/masochism.  In Fifty Shades of Grey, we follow the story of Anastasia Steele, a shy, awkward, college student working in a hardware store.  She is asked by her much more confident roommate to conduct an interview for the school newspaper, who is sick.  When Anastasia, or Ana, goes to the interview, she is met with Christian Grey, a self-made billionaire, who because of his wealth and power, tries to stay out of the media as much as possible.  Christian, immediately infatuated with Ana, pursues her relentlessly, ultimately confiding in Ana that, “the only sort of relationship [he is] interested in,” is one where he is dominant in every way, and she will be his submissive (James, 103).  Ana signs a non-disclosure agreement, and they begin a tumultuous relationship that spans the course of three books, ultimately ending in them getting married and having two children, leaving the BDSM out of their lives.
            When you remove Christian’s need for dominance in every aspect of Ana’s life, what you really have in Fifty Shades of Grey, is the very conventional love story that we have all read at one point or another in our lives: two people meet, fall in love, and save each other from themselves.  The BDSM element, as well as issues of low self-esteem, childhood physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, and abandonment, take Fifty Shades of Grey from being just another Disney fairy tale to being one of the most controversial books of late.  Regardless of how you might feel about these books, I will argue that the conversations stimulated by them contribute positively to our current views on sexuality and traditional gender roles in our society.
            Fifty Shades of Grey has come under fire for several reasons.  One of these is that the book seems to enforce traditional gender roles.  When questioned by Ana about the meaning of ‘dominant,’ Christian explains that, “it means I want you to willingly surrender yourself to me, in all things…I have rules, and I want you to comply with them.  They are for your benefit and my pleasure.  If you follow these rules to my satisfaction, I shall reward you.  If you don’t, I shall punish you, and you will learn” (James, 100-1).  Ana must obey Christian at all times, or she will be punished physically.  Christian goes further, saying, “The more you submit, the greater my joy – it’s a very simple equation” (James, 100).  Carey Purcell, in an article titled, “Fifty Shades of Feminism,” says that Ana’s “wanting to please Christian apparently includes subjecting herself to verbal and emotional abuse from him” (Purcell).  The concept of a woman completely submitting and obeying a man is as traditional as it gets, reminiscent of Biblical law.  Women were stoned to death for disobeying their husbands.  Purcell also expresses her concern about the relationship between Ana and Christian, claiming that it is one of the “incredibly – and dangerously – abusive relationships portrayed” in popular fiction (Purcell).  Christian stalks Ana, is in control of her grooming habits and birth control, and demands that she go to the gym four times weekly, and is even in control of her eating habits, as written in their contract: “The Submissive will eat regularly to maintain her health and well-being from a prescribed list of foods (Appendix 4).  The Submissive will not snack between meals, with the exception of fruit” (James, 105).  Purcell fears the “book’s influence on people and how they view romantic relationships” (Purcell). 
            Today, you can’t seem to get away from the word ‘feminist’.  It’s in popular music, it’s on the television, and some of your favorite celebrities are identifying as feminists.  It’s no surprise that there is so much criticism from feminists of Fifty Shades of Grey.  On the Radical Feminist Hub, blogger ‘Smash’ claims that “Freedom is slavery.  Submissiveness is empowering.  BDSM erotica is feminist… [These are] just a few of the lies that patriarchal culture has served up for women” (Downing, 94).
(More negative here…it’s surprisingly difficult to find peer-reviewed articles condemning Fifty Shades of Grey.  Maybe because it’s obvious, and therefore less interesting?)
            Interestingly, Fifty Shades of Grey has a huge amount of feminist supporters.  When Katie Rophie, in an article titled “Spanking Goes Mainstream,” said that women “may then be especially drawn to this particular romanticized, erotically charged, semi-pornographic idea of female submission at a moment in history when male dominance is shakier than it has ever been” (Rophie).  This statement, implying that women are both tired of and bored with gender equality, and seeking a more comfortable and submissive role sparked an outpouring of rejections of this claim by the liberal feminist movement.  In response to Rophie, blogger ‘Maya’ on Feministing, says, “Really, I’m not perplexed by [fantasies of submission]. And I am in no way appalled.  I am fully in support of anyone doing whatever (safe, consensual) thing that they want to do to get themselves off.  Feminists for Orgasms!” (Downing, 94.) 
             (More positive here…there are a lot to go through.)
            If we push aside the feminism for a minute, there are even more positive outcomes to be seen.  Lucy Jones, in her article “Analyzing Agency: Reader Responses to Fifty Shades of Grey,” claims that the book cultivates discussions about “non-normative” love and sex” (Jones, 226).  Jones also finds that “while the books seem to be presenting a male actor and a female recipient, the readers of these books instead define the relationship in terms of passion” (Jones, 233).  Instead of focusing on the genders of Christian and Ana, it is the emotional connection that they share that is the most powerful take away.  One of her readers responded by saying, “If more people had intense passionate relationships like this (sub/dom or not) A LOT more marriages would be healthier and happier” (Jones, 233).  Pushing further, instead of seeing Ana as being dominated by Christian, readers see Ana as being in control of the relationship.  Ana is “in control of her own sexual choices…it seems, then, that it is possible for women readers to gain a sense of agency in talking about these novels” (Jones, 233).

 In the United States, the discussion about sexuality has already started, but Fifty Shades of Grey has stimulated that conversation further.  Marriage equality is happening in a primarily Judo-Christian oriented county.  We are no longer talking just about who we are allowed to love, but how we are allowed to love them.  As a society, we are becoming more able to accept the choices of others.

Intro

Here's what I've got so far. Just an intro, but I wanted to see how you feel about it. I'm not sure that it's a strong enough set up.


A Cultural Criticism of Fifty Shades of Grey

            When Fifty Shades of Grey was released, it took the world by storm.  It is one of the fastest and bestselling books of all time.  Author E.L. James began the book as a work of Twilight fanfiction, another hugely popular series of books.  What Twilight did not have, however, was a BDSM element.  BDSM is a blanket term for bondage/discipline, domination/submission, and sadism/masochism.  In Fifty Shades of Grey, we follow the story of Anastasia Steele, a shy, awkward, college student working in a hardware store.  She is asked by her much more confident roommate to conduct an interview for the school newspaper, who is sick.  When Anastasia, or Ana, goes to the interview, she is met with Christian Grey, a self-made billionaire, who because of his wealth and power, tries to stay out of the media as much as possible.  Christian, immediately infatuated with Ana, pursues her relentlessly, ultimately confiding in Ana that, “the only sort of relationship [he is] interested in,” is one where he is dominant in every way, and she will be his submissive (James, 103).  Ana signs a non-disclosure agreement, and they begin a tumultuous relationship that spans the course of three books, ultimately ending in them getting married and having two children, leaving the BDSM out of their lives.

            When you remove Christian’s need for dominance in every aspect of Ana’s life, what you really have in Fifty Shades of Grey, is the very conventional love story that we have all read at one point or another in our lives: two people meet, fall in love, and save each other from themselves.  The BDSM element, as well as issues of low self-esteem, childhood physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, and abandonment, take Fifty Shades of Grey from being just another Disney fairy tale to being one of the most controversial books of late.  Regardless of how you might feel about these books, I will argue that the conversations stimulated by them contribute positively to our current views on sexuality and traditional gender roles in our society.

More Outline.

My outline has been evolving, so I wont include all the ideas that I don't like anymore. Here's verbatim what I've looked back on and liked.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One half of my paper will be about Pilar; the other, Maria (possibly)--agreement w/ Stacey Guill...add more about the love aspect though (cite prior readings)

Keys (as not to go into too much summary): brief, but specific context of a particular situation or character

Thesis: blah blah
(Partition sentence: "to prove blah blah I will...1, 2, and 3)

Claim/Topic
Example/Evidence
Analysis
   --or continue paragraph w/ more E.A.E.A.

What is my intervention--no one is talking enough about Pilar (and certain things about Maria).

*Feminist Blogs on Hemingway/FWTBT

Talk about Pilar as a potentially negative female character: essentially pimping Maria for the bridge; possible desire for RJ (pg. 462-464 FWTBT)
Talk about Maria becoming a revolutionary, her influence on RJ, her growth (which had even started before the time that the novel covers), vow to herself to never be raped again- in fact, her fight and struggle while it happened

170-171 of FWTBT

The seemingly docile--<--last sentence of paragraph 2, pg. 14 of "Always Something..." has good explanation"--nature of Maria has so much to be contrasted w/ (see previous page of my outline) ("But will we kill Falangists..."--pg. 17 "AS...")

The touted Pilar can be chosen to expose--in a unique way--Hemingway's need to show either the shortcomings or evils of strong women. (bottom of pg. 12 of "AS"--illustrates Pilar's influence on Maria; top of pg. 14 of "AS" for helpful quote)

Pilar and Maria are not quite foils but comparison of them provides interesting insights. Maria gets interrupted a lot; while Pilar speaks boisterously and drives the conversations.

*Finally a Negative Critic's quote: Edmund Wilson on Maria had to go back to '41--and even then there wasn't much bad to be said of FWTBTs' portrayal of women 

**RJ might actually be a complete asshole (pg. 341-FWTBT, RJ repeatedly disregards Maria's physical pain) [pgs. 25-

Find more Gerry Brenner ("conejo" on pg. 34 of "AS")

Focus more on Pilar and Maria in the intro's summary of FWTBT---> A story of the interactions of the ____ Pilar, the _____ Maria, and the understated RJ with the Spanish War as an inextricably linked backdrop.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Though there's a lot here I like I probably won't go into some things because like you guys said I'd be biting off more than I can chew. I may not focus as much at all on RJ as I thought I wanted to, which is fine cause he's pretty boring. What I hope to do today is find the exact quotes from FWTBT that I need for my argument--which as of now is (very very) basically: Pilar is not admirable; she is bad. Maria is not defenseless; she is strikingly assertive and brave.

A decent amount of readings have backed up the latter; while the former idea is completely my own (though some have unknowingly wandered into that territory). A fear I have is that I may knock these ideas out in maybe 3-4 pages (this is single-spaced right?)...In which case I'm not adverse whatsoever to additionally making the other argument that Pilar indeed is admirable. Pilar, she's so complex. Everything's complex with Hemingway I guess. This should be fun.






























Wednesday, May 6, 2015

So far...still working on this

Ernest Hemingway initially was criticized for his female characters who were either mean, crazy, or evil--occasionally all three. Recently however, critics across the board have looked back on his work and decided that Hemingway deserved more credit than he was due. They found that his works actually took a stand for women--whose relationships with bad men would sometimes (though not always) turn them into bad women. Due to Hemingway's ice-berg style of writing, which calls for short sentences, lack of flowery description, and journalistic tone, many of his sympathies (progressive for his time) went unnoticed. However in two of his posthumous novels, critics note the marked change in his treatment of female characters and his experimentation with the idea of sameness of men and women as well as his interest reversing gender roles for both. Such writing is far more progressive for Hemingway than earlier works leading critics to believe he had undergone some sort of transformation by his mid-life. In "A Matter of Love or Death", Marc Hewson finds, however, that the clues for Hemingway's further evolution can be found in For Whom the Bell Tolls, a novel with very interesting female characters, Pilar and Maria. Through their personal histories and interactions with others--and for Maria, her romance with hero Robert Jordan, in particular--Hemingway provides women who break his traditional "Hemingway women" stereotype, thus flavoring the novel with the feminist sentiment that women are not defenseless and are not to be stuck with the idea of their "victimhood".




Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Cultural Criticism and Fifty Shades of Grey Outline

Cultural Criticism and Fifty Shades of Grey

I     1. Intro
a.       Fifty Shades of Grey is the first book of a trilogy
b.      Began as Twilight fanfiction.
c.        “Mummy/Mommy Porn” is defined as “a term seem[ing] to index a woman whose identity as a mother usually overrides any sexual desires she may have, but who has been awakened by the series” (Jones, 227).
d.      Is Fifty Shades of Grey “challenging or acquiescing in what are essentially quite conservative sexual and gender roles?” (Jones, 226).
e.      Outside of the BDSM element, this is a very common romance…boy meets girl, they fall in love, and live happily ever after.
f.        Thesis: Regardless of how you might feel about these books, I will argue that the conversations stimulated by them contribute positively to our current views on sexuality and traditional gender roles in our society.

        2. Synopsis

a.       Anastasia Steele, a shy, awkward, college student working in a hardware store, is asked to conduct an interview for her roommate who is ill.  She ends up interviewing Christian Grey, a self-made billionaire.  Christian pursues Ana, has her sign a non-disclosure agreement, and together they begin a BDSM relationship.  Issues of low self-esteem, childhood physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, trust, and abandonment, pepper the story, ultimately, after three books, lead to a successful partnership in marriage, will all elements of BDSM left behind them.

        3.  Fifty Shades of Grey has come under fire for several reasons. – (Negatives)

a.       The book reiterates traditional gender roles
                                                               i.      Enforces male dominance and female submissiveness
                                                             ii.      Claimed to be one of the most “abusive relationship[s]” portrayed in popular fiction” (Purcell).
b.      Anastasia Steele is a stereotype, having “low self-esteem…abandonment issues from her father, apparently has only one close friend who bullies her…doesn’t seem to possess any self-sufficiency aside from cooking for her roommate and herself” (Purcell).
c.       Anastasia’s “wanting to please Christian apparently includes subjecting herself to verbal and emotional abuse from him” (Purcell).

        4. Today, you can’t seem to get away from the word ‘feminist’.  It’s in popular music, it’s on television, and all of your favorite celebrities are either identifying as feminists or rejecting the idea in favor of being ‘humanist’.  (The Argument Amongst Feminists)

a.       Katie Rophie writes, “We may then be especially drawn to this particular romanticized, erotically charged, semipornographic idea of female submission at a moment in history when male dominance is shakier than it has ever been” (Downing, 93).
b.      Blogger Maya, at the feminist blog, Feministing, says, “Really, I’m not perplexed by [fantasies of submission]. And I am in no way appalled. I am fully in support of anyone doing whatever (safe, consensual) thing that [sic] want to do to get themselves off. Feminists for Orgasms!” (Downing, 94.)
c.       Blogger Smash, on Radical Feminist Hub, says, “Freedom is slavery.  Submissiveness is empowering.  BDSM erotica is feminist…just a few of the lies that patriarchal culture has served up for women in the bestselling BDSM novel 50 Shades of Grey” (Downing, 94).
d.      These two sides of the argument illustrate the difference between liberal feminists and radical feminists.


4.        If we push aside the feminism for a minute, we can see some positive outcomes. – (Positive Outlooks)

a.       Women are able to talk about their sexuality
b.      People are more willing to be flexible in terms of their sex lives
c.       People are able to be more accepting of the choices of others
d.      Cultivates discussions about “non-normative” love and sex (Jones, 226).
e.      At the end of the trilogy, “Anastasia is presented as having won that most vital prize in a woman’s life – the love of a good man” (Jones, 227). ( I have to rethink this quote…sounds a little tongue in cheek. Maybe I’ll cut it up a little bit.  “Anastasia is presented as having won…the love of a good man”).
References
Downing, Lisa. "Safewording! Kinkphobia And Gender Normativity In Fifty Shades Of Grey." Psychology & Sexuality 4.1 (2013): 92-102. Academic Search Complete. Web. 5 May 2015.
Jones, Lucy, and Sara Mills. "Analysing Agency: Reader Responses To Fifty Shades Of Grey." Gender & Language 8.2 (2014): 225-244. SocINDEX with Full Text. Web. 5 May 2015.

Purcell, Carey. ”Fifty Shades of Feminism – A Response of E.L.James’ ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’.” The Huffington Post. 2 Jan. 2013. Web. 1 May, 2015.

Sunday, May 3, 2015

Introduction and Second Paragraph

Good Morning Everyone,

Here is my introduction paragraph and my second paragraph so everyone can get a feel for what I am writing. Tell me what you all think!

Henry Sturges has existed for five centuries not having aged a second since the moment his life was stripped away from him forcing him to live vicariously through everyone he meets and forcing those around him, including the reader, to project their lives, human and vampire, onto their elder in Seth Grahame-Smith’s The Last American Vampire. Sturges, both young and old, thrives through the interactions he has with many famous figures which Smith weaves perfectly to trick the reader into believing the fantasy of his tale. Particularly the interaction with Abraham Lincoln fuels Sturges fire to continue living his undead life. The Last American Vampire presents the Reader-Response theory brilliantly through the projection of all the characters onto Sturges, including the reader, and in turn Sturges resting his own immortality onto everyone who crosses his path while keeping true to the American way and warping history into fantasy.

            The introduction of the novel is presented through the eyes of Seth-Grahame Smith himself and his interactions with Henry Sturges. Smith himself is so taken by the mythical figure that is Sturges that he himself asks to be turned into a vampire. He also possesses the journals of Henry Sturges. Therefore, he can tell his story. “What follows is the life of Henry Sturges. What follows is the story of an American life” (Smith, 10). Throughout the novel the reader projects themselves onto the life of Henry Sturges in order to relive historical events through the eyes of a man who has seen it all. 

Saturday, May 2, 2015

Guidance about finding articles in databases

Hi all, I just wrote this in an email to one of you and thought I'd post it here in case others have the same questions.

When you find results in the MLA database, there are a few scenarios for where the article is, if we have access to it, and how you locate it:

1. The article is in full text on the database and a full text document, usually in pdf form, appears with the entry.  This is usually highly visible.  You can also tell the database to search for full text results only.  Click "linked full text" on the left side of the screen when you start your search.

2.  The article is available electronically.  Click "Linksource" and it will take you to a screen where you can search for the online journal that the article is in.  Note: some of these articles will say, "title is not held locally," but some are actually available if you follow the link.  I usually click Linksource every time to see whether there's an electronic copy there; it only takes one click and sometimes it's right there!  (See #4.)

3.  The article is available in print in a book.  Usually this is listed as "book chapter" and then the title of the book appears and you can click Linksource and see if we have the book in our print catalog or as an e-book.  Sometimes we do, sometimes we don't. Since we share a library with 6 others schools, many of our books are not at SU, but arrive in one day;  just request delivery to SU.  It's super fast.

4.  The article is not available in print or online.  Many articles say "the title is not held locally" which can mean that our library does not have electronic access to the journal.  The library buys some journals but not others.  Unfortunately, this is the case with lots of materials, since the database is showing you absolutely everything available for your search in every library in the whole world.  We don't have access to everything everywhere.  This can be frustrating, but using the linked full text option in your initial search makes this less frustrating!

Laura